Skip to main content

About your Search

20131124
20131202
SHOW
News 86
Book TV 18
RT News 16
Today 12
( more )
STATION
SFGTV 149
ALJAZAM 148
FOXNEWSW 130
CSPAN 106
CSPAN2 96
MSNBCW 92
SFGTV2 89
CNNW 79
FBC 78
KCSM (PBS) 78
KGO (ABC) 54
KPIX (CBS) 46
KTVU (FOX) 45
KNTV (NBC) 37
KQED (PBS) 34
KRON (MyNetworkTV) 33
( more )
LANGUAGE
English 1398
French 7
Korean 7
Search Results 0 to 49 of about 1,421 (some duplicates have been removed)
it should be not, it should not be surprising that the u.s. government uses all of the lawful tools at our disposal to impede the efforts of valid terrorist targets who seek to harm the nation and radicalize others to violence. joining me now for an exclusive interview, glen greenwald. coming to us on a connectionen
the law. americans, u.s. persons are not exempt from this program. then thirdly, there is a long, ugly history, lawrence in the united states of the u.s. government deeming certain ideas radical. such as the civil rights movement. or socialist and communist. or, anti-war protesters. then taking action to destroy them either their reputations or, their, their professions. and, i think we all ought to be aware of that history and wary of these kind of programs.
are planning a major span specifically on the health care law. what possibility is there for this thawing out you are describing knowing we're going into the midterms with this opposition? >> i do not know. very often the midterm elections and up with the white house in charge having more of the opposition elected in the house or even within the senate. there are some exceptions but that typically is the case. i do not know. i do not imagine that there will be many people running next year in opposition to the white house that will be running to say i want to improve and send me to washington to improve the affordable care act. i do not imagine that will happen. i do not have a crystal ball. i am going on past experience. this could change. >> that keeps the law frozen in time? >> until both sides are willing to come together and able to come together and find common legislation and agreement about how to change the law, it'll stay frozen in time to the extent the white house is unable or chooses not to make certain changes in implementation as in the case of the policies. that will be more i
that have not decided still looking to do whatever they think they can under their laws. not surprising that there are different approaches when you have a state-based system as we do. >> has though been anything you're able to do? there has been a lot of controversy over this. some commissioners said they did not want to go. the naic has learned is we do not enter into the policy considerations. it is an ample mention -- implantation job. there are some who are elected. there are some that are appointed by governors. they may be appointed by a commission. in policyent generally. to >> before we leave this topic, to be clear, even in the 17 states that are deciding to go along with that, there's no guarantee that people keep their policies will get the same rates. is that correct? >> that is correct. of questionsmber that have come up about the decision to have the health and human services department not implement that part of the law that basically required terminations by a certain date in cancellation notices were sent out accordingly. the concern is about having the policies extend
story." >> aimed at the provisions in >> aimed at the provisions in the law that say employers must the law that say employers must pay for all aspects of women's pay for all aspects of women's healthcare include healthcare include contraception. contraception. one american employer is one american employer is resisting the new law and asking resisting the new law and asking the high court to decide if a the high court to decide if a for-profit can share the same for-profit can share the same exemptions as some religious exemptions as some religious institutions and opt out of institutions and opt out of paying for some paying for some provisions in provisions in the affordable care act. the affordable care act. first this background. first this background. >> reporter: hobby lobby is a >> reporter: hobby lobby is a for-profit corporation that for-profit corporation that calls itself, quote calls itself, quote a biblically a biblically founded business. founded business. the company contends offering the company contends offering contraception goes against the contraception goes aga
no background checks. what this amendment does is reflect state law where sex offenders are able to reside. state law says they're for bin from residing a certain amount of feet from a park >> so in this case if there's someone who's a registered sex offender they can't be at the shelter. >> should that address be presented to their probation officer that would be enforced by probation not our services. we won't be screening folks. it's a relationship between the parolee and the probation officer. >> do we have shelters within other proximitys. >> are you supportive of this amendment? i'm not - >> i'm but in terms of this amendment being in terms of state law it's simply putting into the resolution things of state law. it's nothing to do with our agency >> thank you. >> any other comments on the amendments supervisor campos. >> supervisors we intended to convene a community body of both residents business owners in the neighboring areas. as typical when trying to accredit any of our services we feel it's good to have an open dialog when there's opposition from some of the neighbors.
, from law enforcement, from investors and entrepreneurs in recent months, there's still many unanswered questions and unresolved issues. this isn't the first time that advances this technology have posed challenging questions, challenging issues for policymakers and for society as a whole. as we know, technology is dynamic and changes quickly. concepts like e-mail and even the internet itself were once alien and difficult to understand and navigate. now most of us can read and respond to e-mail on a device we keep in a purse or a coat pocket and search the web on multiple platforms. i like to use the example when i first showed up for duty here in the u.s. senate in 2001, we received for every e-mail that came in to us from constituents in delaware and across the country, for every e-mail we received probably 10-15 letters. i asked my staff a couple of months ago to tell me if that ratio had changed, and now for every 12 or 13 e-mails we get, we get one letter. and there's probably a pretty good metaphor for the situation. i'll be first to admit that, like most americans, i am no techni
parts of the world law enforcement are part of the traffic ring. if you come from a country where law enforcement is part of that enslavement, then you are not going to trust law enforcement in another country. sometimes victims that come from another country say i'm better off here no matter how bad this is or no matter how i'm treated. they begin to identify with their trafficker. everything i need from this person. >> where do traffic people live, how do they live, where do they get food, how are they treated? >> they can be forced to work long hours. we had a case where a woman ended up being brought to this country by friends of her family. >> let's get back to that. that sounds like a door we want to open. we are coming back to mosaic. stay with us. >> welcome back to mosaic. today we are talking about a difficult topic. we are talking with sister mary about human trafficking. since 2008 you have won an award and you have a ministry toward this evil. >> we really look, there is three areas we focus in around human trafficking. raising awareness. we do a lot with the community, s
the contraception mandate portion of the law but the administration has allowed some exceptions. >> it's good for our healthcare system in general because we know the overall cost of care is lower when women have access to contraceptive services. and listen, we recognize that many people have strongly held religious views on contraception. which is why we made sure churches and other houses of worship, they don't have to provide it. they don't have to paid for it. >> when it was announced the supreme court would hear the hop hobby lobby case yesterday, the white house put out a statement. our policy is designed to insure that healthcare decisions are made between a woman and her doctor. the president believes that no one, including the government or for-profit corporations should be able to dictate those decisions to women. over the summer the tenth circuit court of appeals in denver ruled in favor of hobby lobby contending because it's not a publicly traded corporation hobby lobby is entitled to be ex-earth from the contraceptive mandate. the supreme court is expected to hear the case in mar
or the law. those 4 things. liver, livelihood, lover and law. within those l's is when somebody shows up in my door, someone suffering, a family member suffering who brings somebody in. when it company ms to treat we know there is different types of treatment, there is evidence base treatment. there is good evidence for it, we do it. there is evidence free treatment, there is no evidence whatsoever and there is evidence proof treatment. one of those evidence proof treatment is incarceration treatment. there was an office inspection in general report and eventually matt case became supervisor for it. i have been involved in other places. treatment in custody doesn't work. flash incarceration does not work. as far as the treatment that do work for alcoholism, alcoholism is a chronic disease like diabetes. hypertension and emphysema. when we look at outcomes for chronic disease, a landmark study for the journal medical association in 1999, showed that results for treatments were no worse or better than any other chronic disease model. so treatment of alcoholism and addiction works. as far
the appellant has asked to be quite sympathetic, under the law that we've passed is that what is in front of us from a jurisdictional standpoint is that we can only consider reductions or adjustments or waivers of the fee if we find that there hasn't been a nexus between the impact of the dwomment in the amount of the fee charged. i'm not sure whether we have discretion beyond that. if i could ask that question to the city attorney? >> john from the city attorney's office, yes, that's correct. the matter before the board today is just the waiver or reduction based on the standard that you indicated. er i think the appellant was making a general request to the board of supervisors that if a board member were interested in sponsoring legislation that would make an amendment to the fee deferral provisions to allow for a later time, that that is something that she would like to see if possible. >> okay. colleagues, any further discussion? is there a motion in this matter? or do i need to come down and make a motion. supervisor kim? >> thank you, i just wanted to -- this is items 19, 20 and 21, i wa
students, allllege the way through to people who have law degrees and practicing in front of the supreme court for two decades. so our goal is if you want to have one place to go learn about the supreme court you can come to us. and in so doing, we give you the inks to tony articles, to pieces on nbc, and we can be about the ublic good supreme court. >> if you would, pleeltz tell us about how are this began. the creativeoff of blog. what was in your mind? >> it was started by accident as many good things are. ago, amy and iars were silting at our house. i thought there's this thing called blogging that you can start for free. why don't you start one about the supreme court. idea being that we were practicing in front of the supreme court. develop a web presence people would look to us and say, gosh, these are the experts. we should hire them for the supreme court case. that was utterly wrong and foolish. turns not to be true at all. the idea.as we like so many people started ith the fact that the cost of distribution was zero. we knew about the supreme court. we were practicing there. yo
our streets our parks or vehicle code the way we build offices this year so many laws public safety and others that it compacts so to post this on the get hub and to allow get hub to be our way in which people what navigate to break it down to make t it usedable by other coders it's kind of like sailing we have had to learn with taking was and to have that on the screen in front of us and how we, in fact, our waters is exactly how get hub z is doing it. where your code is able to be found at mayor's office of civic innovation dot get hub dot l o slash open law. i'm excited to see what gets build and shared. and, of course, we're working with the open law project it's guided us to this kickoff. i'm excited to see something that's been to bureaucratic. by the way, i'm a lawyer my background i used to cause a lot of trouble in the city by you used to explain to a lot of bilingual folks in the city what their rights are. when i did the retina strict i had to explain to elderly people who only spoke chinese to help them exercise the law. that's one small example how a whole set of laws c
. she helped persuade her state legislature to pass a new law. it changed the driver's license form. >> in the past, that section on that form was optional. now when people are going to get their license or renew their license, they will have to answer the question, do they want to become an organ donor? they can either check "yes," or they can check "skip this question." >> by being required to check either "yes" or "skip," people can't just ignore the question like they could before. it's believed that extra moment of consideration might be enough to make more people willing to become organ donors. oh, and, by the way, the name of the legislation? lauren's law. >> wow. that was, like, incredible, to actually have a law named after me, and that could ultimately make a difference in organ donation and hopefully increase the numbers of enrolled donors. it was just a great experience. >> ♪ oh, say, can you see ♪ by the dawn's early light >> lauren shares her story as often as she can. for example, she makes it a point to attend the ceremony where new american citizens are sworn in
yet another part of the law on the wednesday before thanksgiving. welcome to "the kelly file." i'm megyn kelly. we are now just three days away from the obama administration's self-imposed deadline to fix the website millions need to use in the next two weeks or they might not have insurance come january 1. many of those folks had insurance before the law, but it was cancelled as a result of it. tonight a growing number of signs that the obama administration has real fears the site could crash and burn again. it went out for an hour, just on monday. this morning, fox news confirmed that the administration is telling supporters they should not rush to visit health care.gov in the coming days. isn't that the purpose? they need all the people to sign up. but the message is don't go. not many of you anyway. there are still concerns about how much the site can handle. that's a real problem for the millions of americans who have seen their insurance policies cancelled and must sign up for coverage. must sign up by december 23 in order for them and their families to have coverage in the
summary of the laws. the ada, calif. building code, the civil rights, and our experts here will elaborate. we also have a list of certified caps at work in san francisco for you. carla johnson with the mayor's office of disability has created a really good it died of out to interview your experts to make sure you are getting the best quality product for you. been next -- the money you pay for the inspection you can take as a tax deduction. any money that if you have taken can be applied as a tax deduction. this can be done on an annual basis. next, the opportunity, and a fund -- opportunity loan fund, providing for small businesses to pay for the inspection or to make improvements needed. to do it before you receive the lawsuit. and lastly, we of the bar association and their resources. they're providing their legal service for you. this last thing i am going to share with you in terms of what we have seen in our office is that with the individuals, that does not necessarily mean an individual will follow up with a lawsuit. what we've seen in our office is the individual's will send you a
and bigoted comment by another extinguished. he enrolled at holly -- at holy cross college. yeah law school came next. degree,rning the elite he had difficulty finding a big- city law firm job. so he accepted an offer from the attorney general of missouri and assistant attorney general in jefferson city from 1974-1977. after a brief stint in corporate the thenollowed senator danforth to washington dc, just in time for the reagan revolution. years,e next dozen terrence thomas served in all three branches of government as a legislative aide to senator man's worth -- senator danforth, the equaln of opportunity employment commission, and circuit judge on the united states court of appeals for the d c circuit. along the way, he met and married virginia, his soulmate. [applause] in 1991, he was appointed to this agreement court by president george h.w. bush. by this time, he had emerged as an outspoken conservative. so the confirmation process exacted a personal toll. by fathering -- by following the example of his grandfather, he persevered. and our nation is very fortunate that he did. on the c
because of this law. >> by the way, that was a very good way to put it. that was more the weak economy than anything else. >> right. >> we can argue the particulars. one of the things i noticed here is companies are setting us up for the next wallop. >> right. could you imagine if president obama ran on the truth of this stuff? just say he tried to sell it? listen, you're going to get thrown off your plan. you're going to pay more, you know, it's going to be, you know, this is -- >> we're going to subsidize 400% -- >> i mean, this is a big lie and it's coming apart. i tell you, part of me says just let it roll and let the worse happen. the other part of me says that's going to hurt this country really bad. >> what does that mean, fix it? is that what you're saying? i had tom delay on. he said, don't do anything to help this. >> sometimes it's good just to flush it out. >> okay. adam. >> i think that's wishful thinking. i'll try to -- with your permission. to flush it out, that's just not going happen. it's a nice thought on your part -- >> no, it's like, you know, napoleon cominin and
where she was awarded a masters of philosophy. then she got a jd from harvard law school. after law school, she clerked for a judge in the united states court of appeals. then she clerked for justice marshall. then she became a law professor at the university of chicago. she went from there to serve at president clinton's administration in several roles. then she went back to teaching at harvard. she was subsequently named as dean of harvard law school. she was the first female dean of the law school there. in 2009, president obama nominated her for solicitor general of the united states. she served in that office for a full year. she was then nominated as an associate justice of the supreme court. she took that position in 2010 and she fill the vacancy left by justice john paul stevens after his retirement. he was our last lecture at europe law school. -- our last lecturer here at the law school. i brought this along so i could read it. this year, in time magazine, she was named one of their 100 most influential people in the world. i want to read to you what they had to say about
a corporation, does a company have religious freedom? >> asht lawsuit from hobby lob stores. >> health care law's requirement, that employers offer free birth control coverage. >> the affordable care act, violates liberties. >> the question is hobby lobby a person. >> corporations are people, my friend. >> the line by mitt romney. >> essentially the question. >> can a for profit business deny birth control or coverage for that matter. >> this was anner to debated through 2012. >> let's talk about the birth control fight. >> it means you are a slut, right? >> girls put it between their netz. it wasn't that costly. >> how far will this go? >> this will set a dangerous precedent. >> personify corporations. >> corporations are people, my friend. >> that's essentially the question here. >> the supreme court has never decided before. >> breaking news from the supreme court. >>> the supreme court announced to day that it will hear two cases that challenge the affordable care act's contraception mandate on the basis that it violates the company any religious beliefs. that's right, the company any relig
that obama care is in new trouble. as the administration delays yet another part of the law on the wednesday before thanksgiving. welcome to "the kelly file." i'm megyn kelly. we are now just three days away from the obama administration's self-imposed deadline to fix the website millions need to use in the next two weeks or they might not have insurance come january 1. many of those folks had insurance before the law, but it was cancelled as a result of it. tonight a growing number of signs that the obama administration has real fears the site could crash and burn again. it went out for an hour, just on monday. this morning, fox news confirmed that the administration is telling supporters they should not rush to visit health care.gov in the coming days. isn't that the purpose? they need all the people to sign up. but the message is don't go. not many of you anyway. there are still concerns about how much the site can handle. that's a real problem for the millions of americans who have seen their insurance policies cancelled and must sign up for coverage. must sign up by december 23 in order
into the first of the year. this is a challenge because under the law, based on the law of large numbers, what you want is a large pool so that you don't end up with people simply with health conditions, or that will skew the rates, make them much higher. can watch all of the interview with the former senator tomorrow on "newsmakers." we will have a 10:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. eastern here on c- span. >> it was like shock and all. i saw it, that looks that he had on his face, and i could close my eyes and i could see him on the stretcher right now. i could see him putting his hand up, i could see his eyes, i can just close my eyes and i could just see it. i will never forget that first case, that sort of bringing me to reality of what was going on here. tent,ter he got into the there was this initial sort of triage, he gets there, we get the report, we see him, he goes into the tent, the team starts in,ork -- we got pulled myself and my colleague that gote the forward, we both pulled in because the other team wanted us to begin right away. it is not want us to be bystanders. they said you guys ha
interpretation. he has made substantial and important contributions to our law. both in his opinions for the courts and when writing separately. perhaps most notably in the areas of federalism and the federation of power. the jurisprudence of protection and the guarantee of trial by jury. and the law of free political speech. his opinions reflect a deeper appreciation for the liberty- protecting structure of our constitutional system. he has advanced in understanding in the constitution, informed by the vital truths expressed in the declaration of independence, connecting our political and derivative documents. his personal fortitude is example to all who withstand the principal. please join me in welcoming clarence thomas. [applause] good evening and it is so good to see you again. [laughter] he was really loose at the table so i think this is going to be a lot of fun. >> thank you, thank you. >> as i talked about in the introduction, your path to the court is a remarkable american story. i would like to begin our discussion in the middle of the story with your decision to go to law
through a very sensitive stage. he says the new anti-protest laws have been put in place to protect the society. meanwhile unrest is continuing as more protesters take to the streets in clear defiance. human rights groups say it is a major blow to their freedom. let's get more from hoda abdel hamid. hoda what can you tell us about the ongoing protests and the arrests there? >> the protests have just started a short while ago and judging from what we're hearing from the ground, there is quite a significant turnout. from what we understand at this particular moment you have two groups at the square, the reason probably they are there, is security forces have sealed out that area for the past few days. these two groups are actually contending groups in the sense that one of the groups was support general sisi, and the other group is there saying -- it's denouncing the protest law, and also in the past few days it had denounced the article that will allow the government -- allow them -- sorry -- the continuation of civilians being tried in military court. the whole day was full of rumor
law and dropped the notion that he was sorry about anything. welcome to "the kelly file," everyone. i'm megyn kelly. the speech billed as a talk on the economy, but against the backdrop of hollywood, president obama goes on the attack, saying the people want obama care and offering a warning to his critics. and full on blaming the gop for the nation's problems. listen here. >> we'd be a lot further along without some of the dysfunction and obstruction we've seen in washington. we would be a lot further along -- we'd be a lot further along if we could just get folks to act with some sense. if we didn't have one wing of one party that was a little less obsessed with repealing health care for 40 million people, more concerned with making sure the law works, we're going to continue to make progress on all those fronts, and yes, we are going to continue to implement the health care law. the product is good. people want it. and we should not live in a country where people are going bankrupt just because they get sick. and anybody who's going to keep on pushing against that, they will meet m
approach is to hold people accountable without breaking taxpayers. thought it's thirty year career in law enforcement he's unsuccessful lowered crime in all positions >> (speaking spanish.) >> successful lowered crime inl positions >> (speaking spanish.) >>successful lowered crime in a positions >> (speaking spanish.) >> so you know i have to translate in english what you just said robert to. we would like to impress 3 the da is cuban for those cubans on a the house and at the age of 13 he it came here to the united states and a has been successful so we would like to welcome our district attorney george (clapping) >> (speaking spanish.) >> i was telling you earlier that i'm kooulg but my wife is mexican and i'm surround by mexicans all my life so you know i think before we get into the awards here i want inform say a if you words because i think that's a real movement of celebration the mayor talked about the due process of ordinance which is so well-connected to the way that we live here and the way that san francisco way. it's also important to talk about what's going on at th
ability of protecting the rights of disabled. i am proud of the laws enacted in the area for the americans with visibility is that. i come here as an opponent of the convention, strongly believe that when the united states ratify treaties it should be very attentive to how the treaties relate to constitutional standards and traditions, something the senate is always concerned about. is this a particular issue when it comes to human rights treaties, focus much more internally than traditional treaty, additional issues for the u.s. legal system. of particular concern, the broad and vague terms you heard about today, in the disability convention could be used in a manner that would undermine the federal nature of the u.s. constitutional system. to give you a couple examples the convention refers for example to standards governing the care of children, this is a family law topic traditionally regulated in the united states under state rather than federal law. the convention addresses private and governmental conduct without any limitations that would normally apply to federal regulation of pri
you're seeing is not just the website, but the entire policy or law, if you want to call it that. delay it's hard to call it a law with. all the waivers, exemptions and delays granted out the american people don't know where this is going right now. to be told that you're going to have a 20% failure rate, that 20% of people won't be able to t get on it, what does that mean h for the 20% still looking to have health care coverage? 8 >> it's interesting to hear the. white house talk about it. they call it an 80% success insc rate. but 1 in 5 won't be able to get signed on for health care insurance.ngress congressman, i'm curious, you've been in politics, you understanp messaging. i feel like we've been in hype in reverse, setting us up almost for nothing to happen. what are you expecting come tomorrow? >> well, i think this right now you saw a president that was urt trying to talk more about answer immigration reform than this current pressing issue, becausee they don't have any answers.terp they don't have anywhere else ty go. so iwe believe you'll see intero pressure been the dem
that could decide of corporations can ignore parts of federal law raced on the religious police of their owners. the cases center on the controversy over whether for- profit corporations must fully cover birth control and health insurance they provide for their employees. two companies, hundred lobby and consetoga wood from object offer birthem to control. the case could force a rehashing of the landmark citizens united decision which ruled companies have freedom of expression rights that allow unlimited spending on political campaigns. the court could decide now whether companies also have religious freedom rights will stop more in the story later in the broadcast. the u.s. has flown to warplanes over the disputed east china sea, defying a recent event from china. sent overe government the week and a must be notified of any fights over part of the small island chain that is also claimed by japan. flew toagon says it u.s. b-52 bombers as part of a previously scheduled exercise. the u.s., japan, and several other governments have rejected china's claim to an air defense zone over
and there is people all the time up in there educating myself about the law, i know is fast to get in there, but when the wheels are turned to come home, it's slow. i couldn't accept it. people are like they are going to do this to time. i said no, this is clear. this was what was supposed to have been done from the beginning. even my families, my loved wupz ones that lost. that made me fight more. i never gate gave up my fate. my hope is restored. >> with that i would like to thank all of our panelist. thank you. [ applause ] and we are now going to move to our second panel. while they take their seats, this idea of forced treatment versus constitutional rights has always been a tension that we've had in our criminal justice system. there is an issue that came up earlier this year that you may have read about involving this implementation of a court that was supposed to treat individuals who were suffering from long-term alcoholism. and the court was set up in a way where individuals were not being arrested for a crime but instead were being jailed for contempt of court as long as 120-150 days in
issued with an arrest warrant for rebellion because of protests over last few days. >> the law making it illegal to demonstrate out a permit. security forces firing tear gas and water canyon. s. activists for human rights warning that egypt's new law must be changed. >>> iran and turkey calling for a cease-fire in syria. iran supporting the assad very cream, turkey backs the rebels trying to overthrow the government. those peace talks takes place january 22nd. coming up later she called it her fair fairytale dress. the dress that goes up for auction on monday. we'll tell you what people are doing to put down their phones. >> ten thousand from now it will be against the law to have an electronic device in your hands and drive. opening doors ... opening possibilities. taking the impossible from lab ... to life. on techknow, our scientists bring you a sneak-peak of the future, and take you behind the scenes at our evolving world. techknow - ideas, invention, life. >> every morning from 5 to 9am al jazeera america brings you more us and global news than any other american news channel. fi
from now, it will be against the law to have an electronic device in your hands and drive. >> all these folks are making a whole lot of money. >> you are one of the voices of this show. >> i think you've offended everyone with that kathy. >> hold on, there's some room to offend people, i'm here. >> we have a right to know what's in our food and monsanto do not have the right to hide it from us. >> so join the conversation and make it your own. >> watch the stream. >> and join the conversation online @ajamstream. >> evey weeknight on al jazeera america change the way you look at news tune into live news at 8 and 11 >> i'm john seigenthaler and here's a look at the headlines.. >> infomation changes by the hour here... >> our team of award winning journalists brings you up to the minute coverage of today's events... then, at 9 and midnight. america tonight goes deeper with groundbreaking investigative coverage of the nation's top stories... >> a fresh take on the stories that connect to you... >> live news at 8 and 11 eastern followed by america tonight on al jazeera america there's
discipline, but holly has come up with a really wonderful solution within law enforcement that we would love you to talk about and it's preventive and solution. >> thank you. it's not going to be a shock to you that i don't have a sizzle reel but i did manage to get a few powerpoint slides in so it's a good thing if i can get my next one. can you advance it for me please? so it is a safety course that i created with yahoo. we partnered together. i started asking questions the first day so my boots are on the ground and i'm in the schools and i love doing what i do, and i believe wholeheartedly and i believe it was the soft power -- yes, i love it. i think it's effective in so many ways, so i had luckily teamed up with the right people at yahoo who were really amazing and just the foresight they saw, and believed in the concept that law enforcement needs to be a piece of this puzzle and have some solutions. we have a unique part in the schools and with kids and this did get certified for the peace officer standards and we get credit for that being police officers and our training and o
there desire to change the president's health care law. just one of 100 examples i could give. there's a lot of things that to a number ofdo hypothetically bizarre things. they could seek to ultimately sell the capital for scrap or disband -- the expressions of approval or disapproval are not in order of the committee. i'm trying to get to a point here. and despite faith, our challenges sometimes in the institution and american people, who would say, that is way off the face. in suggesting that whatever language is necessary, i don't think this congress itss to be bound itself in actions by what the previous congress decided as is evidenced by those who wanted to undermine the president's health care law. i present congress wants to change what a previous congress did. i think that only a congress might be able to change a future rut or changes in the american with disabilities act. it would have to be signed by a president. just creating some balance in that is a reality of any future issue is realistic. >> i largely agree with what you said. if congress decided to amend the ada, it could c
of cyber bullying and that is why i did a remarkable partnership in south florida with local law enforcement who had gone into schools talking about bullying, including cyber bullying and giving people concrete examples of things of situations they saw, it was remarkable. and that is why we will continue to do that work. so i hope today as we move forward you will understand that we are in this together with you at the department of justice. this is an all hands on deck enterprise. there is so much to do. i hope at the end of this day we will indeed all follow the lead of that student, walk out and say what are one or two things i'm going to do differently and better? how are we going to improve this situation? i hope if you take one and only one thing from melinda and my and ruslyn's remarks today, if you have an idea, please bring them to us. we want to learn from you. we are in this together and i want to say thank you because the most important thing we have is a recognition that you understand that this is indeed a national issue for us to deal with. i'm looking forw
it seth's law in honor of her, she had been in and around sacramento for a long time. so the legislation in and of itself, i don't think it's going to work miracles, but it is definitely on people's radar now and i think you hear it in the media more and more. the reason we have a suicide barrier and the reason we are having legislation like this is because of the parents and the families because they are the ones that hurt the most and i would imagine part of the therapeutic thing, you've got to tell this story and telling it in the right place and the right time can be very effective. so seth's law does require that if you witness an act of bullying, that you must report it. >> is that for anybody? >> anyone, but particularly teachers. there is a -- sometimes we see things that aren't very pleasant and if you've ever taken it to muni, you know what i mean. your tendency is to turn away. i heard the word faggot on the play ground when i taught. the teachers were intimidated, they didn't want to be seen to have any empathy because that might reflect on them. it's crazy but that's p
signed into law. gwen: not immigration. >> not guns. not immigration. not -- moved some on energy in terms of executive action. and they'll argue on guns. they did some executive action as well. but nothing of the things they sent to the hill. jobs and most importantly, i think, the president talked during the election last year about the fever breaking. this idea that after he was reelected there wouldn't be the incentive on the part of the opposition to be so opposed to everything that he did. and obviously that turned out not to be the case. the fever if anything seems as hot as ever. gwen: if there's fever about anything it's about health care. let's get to some of our viewers' questions. this virginia voter is exasperated by the health care debate. >> i want to know why they are so afraid of the health care law? is it because maybe the big companies will not support their campaign? gwen: now, that of course is theodora's opinion, karen. but what is the state of this right now? is there fear of the health care law? >> there is fear of the health care law. there has been all al
Search Results 0 to 49 of about 1,421 (some duplicates have been removed)